m (Forgot signature again, argh!) |
(agreed) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Does anyone have any objections? --[[User:MattyDienhoff|MattyDienhoff]] 04:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
:Does anyone have any objections? --[[User:MattyDienhoff|MattyDienhoff]] 04:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
| + | ::I don't; I think you're completely right about the terminology. [[User:EVula|EVula]] <span style="color: #999;">// [[User talk:EVula|talk]] // [[User:EVula/admin|<span style="color: #366;">☯</span>]] //</span> 06:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 06:16, 20 February 2008
In the interest of simplicity and standardizing the titles of the zombie articles, I think we should rename this page "Zombie". The terms "Headcrab Zombie" and "Zombie" are pretty much interchangable, but "Fast Headcrab Zombie" and "Poison Headcrab Zombie" are very uncommon terms and I've already caught myself creating broken links that lead to the universally accepted titles of "Fast Zombie" and "Poison Zombie". What next? Combine Soldier Headcrab Zombie? :P
It just strikes me as a pedantic and overly complex way of naming them, and this non-standard way of doing things has already caused me quite a bit of confusion. Especially since all these zombie variants are referred to in the various templates as all sorts of other names as well: "poison zombie", "fast zombie", "classic zombie", and "standard zombie". --MattyDienhoff 15:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Does anyone have any objections? --MattyDienhoff 04:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)